Will I be banned from acting as a director?

It would be wrong to imply HMRC simply agree to TTP upon application. PBC Business recovery and insolvency practitioner

A common question we, at PBC, are asked by directors who are facing the tough decision of closing down their business.

It is understandable when the media report profile disqualifications, such as ex-England and Liverpool midfielder, John Barnes, being disqualified for 3 ½ years from April 2024.  However, dig into that story and you hear that his company went into liquidation owing HMRC £190,000 following a complete failure of addressing the tax affairs.

In order to answer the headline question, we must first look at some context.  In the 14 years ending with the Insolvency Services report for 2022/23 there have been in total 16,440 director disqualifications – an average of 1,174 disqualifications each year.  Over the past ten years, available records show the average number of corporate insolvencies stands at 16,724 per annum.

The above statistics may provide a degree of comfort, but if you end up being one of those disqualified, that is no consolation.  So, what must you avoid to ensure you do not join the likes of John Barnes?

The Insolvency Services have two primary duties to consider before deciding whether a director ought to face disqualification proceedings, namely

  1. Is it in the public interest?
  2. Does the conduct of a director merit allegations of being unfit?

Unfit conduct’ includes:

  • allowing a company to continue trading when it can’t pay its debts
  • not keeping proper company accounting records
  • not sending accounts and returns to Companies House
  • not paying tax owed by the company
  • using company money or assets for personal benefit

The reported numbers for 2022/23 amounted to 932, of which 812 were directors giving disqualification undertakings and only 120 being court orders.  Some of the headline figures are:

  • 185 treated HMRC unfairly (as opposed to other creditors).
  • 147 – Accounting matters.
  • 41 – transactions to the detriment of creditors (e.g. selling/transferring assets).
  • 459 – COVID-19 financial support abuse (primarily, inappropriate bounce back loan applications or the use of the funds when received).

A director (or the board of directors) should never be shy in taking advice, whether that is from the company accountant or solicitor.  Alternatively, if directors believe their company is insolvent, or likely to become insolvent, they should be consulting with an insolvency practitioner who can advise, based upon both current issues and experience.  In short, directors should never to assume but seek advice early.

If you need any advice or assistance on any corporate restructuring or insolvency-related issue, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency on 01604 212150 (Northampton), 01908 488653 (Milton Keynes) or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk. Alternatively, visit www.pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk for further information.

Following Insolvency, is a director an employee?

An employee of a business in liquidation will have various entitlements that can be claimed against the Redundancy Payments Service (“RPS”).  Those entitlements fall under the Employment Rights Act.

In the past the RPS have sought to reject claims made by the directors.  At first, RPS claimed directors were making themselves voluntarily redundant.  This approach was quashed by the Court of Appeal who said meeting their statutory duties prevailed and redundancy was a direct result of meeting those duties.

The other argument has been a director is not an employee of the company, but an officer who is not entitled to claim employment rights.  The RPS place the burden of proof that a director is also an employee, firmly on the director.  Indeed, the RPS send directors a very challenging questionnaire that critics say is designed to draw the conclusion a director is not an employee.

However, there has been a glimmer of hope for directors following a recent Employment Tribunal case   This case arose following the RPS rejecting their claims, saying neither of the claimant directors were employees.  The case was heard on 15 April 2024 where the judge cited the factors, taken together, that demonstrated the claimant directors were employees included:

  1. They attended work for the duration of the operating hours each day.
  2. There was a clear distinction between their roles as an employee and their role as a director.
  3. They worked for set hours between 20 and 25 hours per week.
  4. They were paid a regular salary which was subject to the PAYE scheme.
  5. Pay slips and P60 tax documents were issued.
  6. They conducted themselves in the same way as other employees when absent and when booking leave.
  7. There is no evidence that they could substitute another for the role of an employee.
  8. There is no evidence that they used company money as personal money.
  9. They were accountable to each other and the accountant.
  10. They did not work anywhere else.

Both directors were awarded statutory redundancy and pay in lieu of notice.

Nobody plans for their company to fail.  However, directors should ensure they have a binding contract of employment in place that is up to date and commensurate to the employment role they carry out.  Together with the above points, this will help to reduce the chances of the RPS being able to reject a claim for payment of your employment entitlements.

If you need any advice or assistance on any corporate restructuring or insolvency-related issue, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency on 01604 212150 (Northampton), 01908 488653 (Milton Keynes) or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk. Alternatively, visit www.pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk for further information.