Increase in winding-up petitions

Whilst corporate insolvency statistics generally focus on creditors’ voluntary liquidation, statistics for October evidence a significant increase in winding up petitions being presented by creditors.

 

A total of 406 petitions were presented in the month and, as you would expect, HMRC accounted for a large percentage of these (26%). However, unusually, 99 of these petitions were presented by a single bank.

 

Historically, it is rare for a bank to present a petition. Indeed, for the period January 2022 to September 2022 the bank in question issued no winding-up petitions. This leaves us to question the reasoning behind the bank’s stance.  Is it due to the bank having to exhaust all avenues of recovery before government backed loans are repaid, or is it the bank enhancing their debt enforcement policy?

 

The presentation of a winding-up petition is generally the last resort for a creditor and we would urge those receiving one to try reaching a sensible alternative, such as a payment plan. However, if this is not achievable and you are concerned that a winding-up petition could be presented against your company or, indeed, you have any  insolvency-related issue, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency to discuss and advise on your situation on 01604 212150 or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk.

 

What is it you want to do?

American General George Patton once said “Do not try to make circumstances fit your plans. Make plans that fit the circumstances.”

 

Where companies are concerned it is often overlooked that behind a company and title of director is a human, with feelings, concerns and often, a family to support.  That company is their source of domestic income or, more deeply, it is their “Baby”, their life or a family generational entity where personal emotions often prevail.

 

A question we at PBC always ask directors and individuals surrounds what their ideal solution to the challenges they are facing is.  Often the reaction is one of surprise as they have either assumed the options are limited or they have simply not thought beyond the traumas they are experiencing at the time.

 

At PBC we cannot think of anything worse than someone adopting one option, only to find there was a better alternative that suited the circumstances.  Should I look at an individual voluntary arrangement or go bankrupt?  Should I place my company into liquidation when one of the restructuring and turnaround options are available?  Questions we help you to determine the answers to.

 

It is accepted, circumstances can dictate/restrict the options available.  One of those is simply one of not taking advice at an early stage.  Equally, a director could say they have simply had enough of running the business and want to get out in the quickest manner.  Regardless of the circumstances, we are of the opinion following your ideal path (where possible) is far more appropriate than simply looking at the perceived way forward.  In other words, you make your plans to fit the circumstances.

 

If you require advice or assistance on any insolvency-related issue or with mediation, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency to discuss and advise on your situation on 01604 212150 or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk.  Alternatively, visit www.pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk for further information.

Not all balls are round!

Worcester Warriors and Wasps have entered administration in recent weeks

Every rugby fan reading this, and many more besides, will have heard the news two Premiership Clubs, Worcester Warriors and Wasps have entered administration in recent weeks.  I thought I would take the opportunity to explain some of the terminology you may have read about in recent weeks.

 

Firstly, administration itself.  Administration is designed to protect a company whilst plans are formulated to achieve one of the statutory objectives which focus on either rescuing the company as a going concern or to achieve a better return for creditors than would be achieved if the company was immediately placed into liquidation

 

Once a company is placed into administration, it is placed under the control of an insolvency practitioner (called the administrator) and receives protection from creditors (known as a moratorium) which prevents action being taken (or continued) against the company without the permission of the court or the administrator.

 

Prior to entering into administration, press releases from Wasps said they had “filed notice in the High Court that they intend to appoint administrators to protect the club’s interests” and that “the move does not mean the business is in administration”.  It said it will provide “a crucial period of grace” whilst efforts were made to “secure the long-term future of the group”.

 

This relates to one of the ways in which an administrator can be appointed.  The directors of a company can take the steps to place the company into administration.  However, if there are creditors with qualifying floating charges over the company then notice must be served on these creditors prior to the company entering administration, giving the charge holder five business days’ notice.  It is this notice of intention to appoint an administrator which is referred to in the Wasps press releases but which also places an interim moratorium over the company resulting in the same effect whereby no legal actions can again be taken or continued against the company.

 

The rumours after Wasps filed the notice of intention was that a pre-pack was being prepared.  A pre-pack administration sale is a formalised way of selling a business to a third party or the existing directors if the business has financial problems and/or is experiencing pressure from its creditors.

 

The sale of the business happens immediately before or after the company enters administration. The administrator then reports to creditors that the business has been sold as part of his proposals to creditors.  Where the purchaser is a connected party, the administrator may only proceed if the sale is either approved by creditors or the purchaser obtains a report from an (independent) evaluator.

 

For an administration to be a viable option for a company, advice needs to be taken at an early stage.  If you require any advice or assistance on any insolvency-related issue, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency to discuss and advise on your situation on 01604 212150 or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk.  Alternatively, visit www.pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk for further information.

 

The cost of using prohibited name

Last week we reported on, what was termed by the Supreme Court as, “A Momentous decision,” that laid down the duties of directors. However, coming quietly behind it was another decision that could also have huge implications for directors.

 

When a company goes into an insolvent liquidation, its name becomes prohibited and there are various restrictions surrounding using a name (or brand) that is so similar that it may cause confusion to the public.  For example, if a company was known as “Big Ruined Industry Limited,” any director setting up a successor company and calling it (say) “Big Ruined Industry (2022) Limited” would be in breach of using a prohibited name.

 

What directors are all too often unaware of is a breach of the prohibited name provisions is a criminal offence and a director could be held personally liable for the debts of the company.  This is what has happened in the recent Court of Appeal decision of PSV 1982 Limited -v- Langdon [2022] EWCA Civ 1319.

 

In this case, Mr Langdon was director of Discovery Yachts Limited (“DYL”) and Discovery Yachts Group Limited (“Group”).  A customer commenced legal proceedings against both companies, resulting in DYL going into liquidation.  Some two years later, Group went into administration and then subsequently into liquidation.  The customer claimed Mr Langdon was in breach of using a prohibited name and, as a consequence, was personally liable for their claim.

 

The principal ground of defence was that it is unjust for someone (Langdon) to be bound by a judgment in proceedings (that were against DYL and Group) in which he had not been heard, or able to mount a defence.  In dismissing this argument, the Court of Appeal said the criminal sanctions imposed by breaching the provisions of re-using a prohibited name prevailed and so, it followed, any award must do likewise.

 

Mr Langdon now finds himself personally liable for some £1.6 million with his right to appeal being rejected.

 

Legislation does provide for certain exceptions that enable the re-use of a prohibited name and, with the number of “Phoenix” liquidations steadily rising, directors should ensure they follow set procedures to ensure they do not fall into the same trap as Mr Langdon.  The courts view is those set procedures are so straight-forward, there is no room for excuse if they are not followed correctly.

 

If you require any advice or assistance on any insolvency-related issue, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency to discuss and advise on your situation on 01604 212150 or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk.  Alternatively, visit www.pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk for further information.

What Are a Director’s Duties to Creditors?

figures

 

In the recently reported case of BTI vs Sequana, the Supreme Court has finally answered the above question.  Put simply, directors owe a duty to creditors when the company is, or is likely to become, insolvent.

 

When is the duty triggered?

 

The Companies Act 2006 requires directors of a company must act in a way which would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its shareholders.  Sequana clarified this duty and extended it to requiring the directors to take into account the creditors’ interests as well as those of the shareholders upon the company being, or likely to become, insolvent.  “Likely” in this instance was defined to mean more probable than not.

 

What is the content of the duty?

 

The Supreme Court acknowledged that the duty placed upon directors is dependent on the facts of each particular case.  Furthermore, the directors will need to undertake a balancing exercise between the interests of directors and creditors on a sliding scale with the more precarious the financial health of the company the more the interests of the creditors should be prioritised by the directors.  For example, where insolvency is inevitable, then the interests of the creditors will be paramount.

 

What are the implications of this case?

 

The Judges in the Sequana case were wary not to apply the duty at a very early stage in a company’s financial distress, being eager to promote a rescue culture and to avoid placing overdue stress and burdens on company directors.  One of the judges said, “a reasonable decision by directors to attempt to rescue a company’s business in the interests of both members and creditors would not in my view involve a breach of the duty”.

 

However, the judgement also noted that this is a developing area of law where some of their commentary may be subject to future appeals.

 

As always, at PBC we strongly encourage directors of companies in or facing financial distress to take advice at an early stage.  Doing so increases the likelihood of a company’s survival and reduces the risk of directors falling foul of the duty outlined in the Sequana case.  The correct application of a director’s duties is subjective and will always be measured against the individual circumstances.  However, determination of conduct will generally rest on whether a director has acted fair (to all creditors) in a balanced approach and without conflict of interest.  Get this wrong and a director could expose themselves to personal liability to restore the company to its former position.  Get it right and you will be seen as fulfilling your duties.

 

If you require any advice or assistance on any insolvency-related issue, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency to discuss and advise on your situation on 01604 212150 or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk.  Alternatively, visit www.pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk for further information.

 

 

Director loans

 

As a director, do you owe your company any money and, if so, do you know the potential consequences for not repaying the amount?

 

Since the availability of bounce back loans and CBILs, a common feature in companies we are asked to advise upon is the presence of an adverse director loan account (“DLA”) where a director has drawn funds above and beyond their remuneration package in order to address personal commitments or just to acquire luxury items.  This creates a debt, which is repayable to the company.

 

However, what about the other potential issues arising?  These include:

 

  • HM Revenue & Customs can determine a DLA as income and assess a tax liability based upon the unpaid balance, in accordance with section 455 Corporation Tax Act 2010. This assessed tax liability can be held against a director

 

  • The Redundancy Payments Service will look at this as grounds to reject your claims for entitlements as an employee of an insolvent company. While the basis of their refusal to entertain director claims is wrong, in law, until it is challenged they will use a DLA as sound reasoning for not paying a director.  This could amount to several thousand pounds in many cases that a director loses.

 

 

So, what can you do when confronted with this situation, particularly if there is an insolvent situation looming?

 

  1. First, ensure the balance is correct. All too often a DLA becomes a “Dumping” ground for unallocated accounting entries.  Make sure you have an agreed balance.

 

  1. Does the company owe you money? If you have paid for goods or services using your own funds or credit card, have these been posted to the DLA?  This may also include your employee entitlements, in terms of wages and accrued holiday pay.

 

  1. If you can, repay the agreed balance, which in turn prevents the Redundancy Payments Service from using an adverse loan from rejecting your employee entitlements.

 

  1. Offer to repay the agreed balance to an appointed liquidator by way of instalments.

 

  1. Alternatively, offer a one-off payment in full and final settlement.

 

Settlements (either by way of instalments or otherwise) are always open to negotiation but can make repaying a DLA more manageable or, in the case of a lump sum settlement, remove that burden from a directors’ mind.

 

The exposure risk of a settlement that is lower than the agreed balance is HMRC could look at a section 455 assessment against the unpaid residue of the loan.  It is not a certainty, but it remains a risk nonetheless.

 

The key message is where a DLA exists, take advice and be prepared before taking that next step.

 

If you require any advice or assistance on any insolvency-related issue, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency to discuss and advise on your situation on 01604 212150 or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk.  Alternatively, visit www.pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk for further information.

And….cut!

Stacks of coins

Those of you old enough to remember will recall the days of queuing to get into the local cinema to watch the likes of the latest Bond movie, the original Star Wars perhaps, or even Grease.  There were no reserved seats and it was a case of first come, first served.

 

The cinema industry has moved on from those halcyon days, but the key ingredient has remained the same; a good film to attract the audience.

 

And here lies a problem.  Due to the pandemic, many of those blockbuster films were suspended and even to this day are yet to be released.  The first ingredient to the business model is suddenly missing.

 

The world’s second largest cinema chain is Cineworld who operate 751 sites across 10 countries (102 of which are in the UK).  Cineworld recently announced they were consulting with solicitors after reporting suffering a £429 million loss in the last financial year.  It was also reported the group had liabilities of a staggering £4 billion.

 

In those “Good old days” there were no videos, DVDs or live streaming, so if you wanted to see the latest blockbuster movie you had to visit the cinema, or wait 2-3 years for its release on television, normally around Christmas.

 

In modern society, these films become readily available shortly after their release.  Indeed, this has been an issue with many scheduled film releases being delayed.  A statement from Cineworld about their current plight said,

 

“Despite a gradual recovery of demand since reopening in April 2021, recent admission levels have been below expectations.”  This is as a result of few films being available to attract the audience.

 

It is now being muted that Cineworld may enter into Chapter 11 (in the USA) and some form of restructuring vehicle in the UK.

 

At Cineworld, film releases are its raw materials, whereas admissions equate to their income.  At PBC we are seeing many businesses that are suffering a similar fate, only film release is replaced by materials, for example and admissions are similarly replaced with customers who, for one reason or another, are suspending or even cancelling orders.  Both of these issues have an adverse impact on cashflow and, in some cases, jeopardise the viability of the company itself.  “Cash is king” we are all led to believe, yet if a business cannot secure the supplies or is prevented from continuing with a contract then it is at serious risk of failure.

 

If you require any advice or assistance on mediation or any insolvency-related issue, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency to discuss and advise on your situation on 01604 212150 or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk.  Alternatively, visit www.pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk for further information.

The latest insolvency statistics

Listening to the news all we seem to be hearing is inflation has reached levels not seen in 40 years, petrol prices surging to record levels following the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the demands of employees, including industrial action, for wage increases are putting pressure on businesses and, in particular, their cash flow.  Add to this the cost of raw materials and goods that place a further squeeze of profit margins and you can only conclude it is tough out there in the business world.

 

The Insolvency Service latest statistics, released last week seem to reflect the tough time businesses are facing at the moment with 1,827 company insolvencies in July 2022, a rise of 67% compared with the same month in Covid affected 2021 but also 27% higher than July 2019.  The majority of this figure is creditors’ voluntary liquidations (CVL), which increased to 1,609, some 60% higher than both 2021 and 2019.  Indeed, the level of CVLs for the second quarter of 2022 was the highest on record.

 

The number of compulsory liquidations fell by approximately half from the number in July 2019.  Given the majority of compulsory liquidations pre-pandemic were based on petitions from HM Revenue & Customs, this is a sign that HMRC remain more prepared to compromise than in future.  How long this approach will remain is uncertain so acting now is imperative.

 

While these figures appear daunting, some of the liquidations were companies where the core business was sound; it was purely a cash flow issue, combined with an unmanageable tax liability that prevented a turnaround situation.  This is due to the change in law whereby HMRC now hold secondary preferential status for a large proportion of their unpaid debt.

 

Should you or a client require any advice or assistance on a company suffering as a result of the cost-of living or any insolvency-related issue, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency to discuss and advise on your situation on 01604 212150 or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk.

 

Files with Insolvent written on

Treading water – not a bad thing!

calculator

 

With all the doom and gloom being reported, be it interest rate increases, utility price hikes and the general cost of living sky rocketing, there is nothing wrong with treading water. Whilst the aim in business is to make profit, given the current economic climate, just covering overhead costs and being able to trade on should be seen as a success.

 

Insolvency numbers are,  unfortunately, on the rise and if you or a client are finding  treading water is becoming increasingly difficult then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency to discuss and advise on your situation on 01604 212150 or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk.

Insolvency Act – Can be a powerful tool.

Recently we were appointed liquidators in a compulsory liquidation on the urgent application of the Secretary of State

 

In between presentation of the petition and the winding up order being made all company assets were sold by the directors for circa £20K (apparently valued independently) with the payment terms of the sale being deferred consideration over a 6-month period.

 

We won’t drill into the detail of Section 127 (1) of the Insolvency act but, in short, any transaction between the presentation of a petition and the making of the winding up order is void, unless ratified by the court.  Having informed the transacting parties the £20K sale was void and taken advice from an agent we decided the best form of realising the assets and testing the market was by way of auction in situ.  Some 5 weeks later the auction concluded with total realisations achieving £150K, which in addition to other payments made to agents over the same period will result in a better return to creditors.  As the title states,  the Insolvency Act is a powerful tool and used correctly certainly benefits creditors.

 

Should you or a client require any advice or assistance on any insolvency-related issue, then please contact PBC Business Recovery & Insolvency to discuss and advise on your situation on 01604 212150 or email to enquiries@pbcbusinessrecovery.co.uk.